Word on the Streets

The Volunteer Orientation Guide


The Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition is rolling out a Volunteer Orientation Guide for 2014.  As a volunteer-led organization, our work is done by volunteers (supported by a sparse staff) - this guide is an orientation about the Coalition that we hope will make it easier for you to volunteer!



Background Information: The Coalition's mission, vision, history, plus a listing of board members and an organizational chart.



Volunteer Opportunities: Some detail about how you can volunteer with the Coalition.  Options include advocacy, communications, event hosting, outreach, and building the Coalition's capacity any way you can. Follow your interests and take a look!



Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition Accomplishments: Our top accomplishments since we were founded (2009), and a graph showing how our member and volunteer support has grown.



Other Initiatives & Events: Find out about big initiatives like Bikeways for Everyone, Open Streets, and Bike Week. Also fun are JoyRides, Happy Hours, and Fundraising events here. If any of these areas strike your interest, please email [email protected].



Bicycle-Related Organizations (our partners): These are our allies.  We've partnered with many of these organizations in the past, and wish to keep looking for new ways to work together.  This list includes brief descriptions on where we all fit into the Minneapolis bicycling community in some cases, how we partner with them.



Frequently Asked Questions: You had questions, and we're pretty sure we've found the answers. Check out some of the most frequently asked questions from our volunteers -- and let us know if there is anything we should add.



Volunteer Toolkit : EVERYTHING you may want to know if you are leading an event or workgroup with the Coalition. Planning resources, converstation templates, even some fun activities and ice breakers are here!   



We hope that you are able to find ways to use these resources. Bookmark the Volunteer Orientation Guide to find all of the info in one easy place when you need it. Enjoy!


Four things Minneapolis can learn from Seattle' bike plan


Cross-posted from Bikeways for Everyone



Seattle has been working on a bike master plan, and it looks really, really good. The plan, which city council will vote on early this year, calls for drastic improvements to Seattle's bike network by 2030. Here are the details, courtesy of Seattle Bike Blog:




  • 50 new miles of protected bike lanes


  • 52 upgraded miles of protected bike lanes


  • 32 new miles of off-street trails (many along highways over bodies of water)


  • 239 new miles of bike boulevards (called "neighborhood greenways" in the plan)



There's also a map showing where the proposed bike routes would go. 



As the City of Minneapolis and Hennepin County rework their bike plans, it's useful to draw lessons from Seattle's achievements. The cities are roughly comparable. Seattle just bid adieu to a progressive bike-friendly mayor. So did Minneapolis. Seattle has a highly-educated healthy population. So does Minneapolis. Seattle's home to the corporate headquarters of Fortune 500 companies like Starbucks, Amazon, and Nordstrom. Minneapolis has Target, US Bank, Xcel Energy, and Ameriprise. Seattle has Macklemore and Ryan Lewis, Minneapolis has Doomtree. What can Minneapolis learn from Seattle?



Protected bike lane in Seattle1) Get businesses on board.



Studies show that biking is good for business. A report from Portland State University shows that a customers who bike make more frequent trips and spend more money on average than customers who drive. As you might expect, bike infrastructure is a boon to local shops: after they built a protected bike lane in Manhattan, nearby stores saw sales increase by 49%, while the average growth across the borough was just 3%. Employees who commute by bike are healthier and more productive.



There are many ways businesses can make profitable investments in bike stuff. They can make the pledge with Bikeways for Everyone, which costs zero dollars. They can reward bike commuters, like Quality Bicycle Products and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation do. They can use the city's cost-sharing program to build more bike parking for employees and customers, or they can follow Amazon's lead and actually build a protected bike lane by their corporate headquarters. Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel is trying to attract talented workers with a world-class network of bikeways, and Minneapolis businesses should join the movement for safe, convenient bikeways to gain a competitive edge.



2) Talk to — and listen to — stakeholders



If you're an activist, you might be tempted to focus exclusively on changing the minds of "decision-makers" — elected and appointed officials, planners, and engineers. They're the important ones, right?



Not always; sometimes change happens from the bottom-up. Seattle's popular and visionary bike plan was influenced and supported by stakeholders from all corners of the city. The Seattle Department of Transportation collectively spent thousands of hours meeting with neighborhood organizations, businesses, residents, and other stakeholders all over the city, listening to their hopes and concerns for their neighborhoods. All this work paid off in two ways. First, the stakeholders' input improved the plans by tailoring them to the unique needs of each neighborhood. Second, the stakeholders became emotionally invested in the plan, and worked to see it come to fruition. There's hardly a more effective way to persuade a public official than by packing a meeting with diverse and enthusiastic supporters of safe streets.



Bikeways for Everyone is working hard to involve places of worship, PTA boards, health advocates, local businesses, large corporations, racial equity groups, and car-sharing companies to work together to improve Minneapolis's streets. If you're interested in getting more information for your organization, just send an e-mail to [email protected].



3) Communicate clearly



A well-organized public outreach campaign can be ruined by too much engineering jargon. Some of the Seattleites who spoke against the bike plan were confused about the terminology. Seattle Bike Blog reports: "One neighbor said she would prefer a 'slow bike trail' over a 'cycle track.' These terms, as far as I can tell, refer to the same thing." Recent research shows that practically no one knows what "cycle track" means, so let's get more descriptive: "protected bike lane" clearly conveys the characteristics and benefits of the infrastructure.



Another speaker in Seattle was concerned that the protected bike lane would "occupy half the street," in contradiction to the dimensions in the plan. People receive and retain information in different ways, so it's important to have cross-sections, bird's-eye views, detailed descriptions, and artistic renderings so all kinds of folks can wrap their heads around the proposals.



4) Don't shame people — entice them



Carbon emissions are bad, and higher bike ridership will help reduce the amount we pollute. But there are exciting things that a network of protected bikeways will do, too!



Kids on bikes by carfreedays on Flickr



It's also about attracting young workers to Minneapolis. It's about easing the burden of transportation costs on low-income families. It's about creating opportunity for communities of color by connecting neighborhoods. It's about reducing the congestion and wear-and-tear on our streets. It's about rebuilding the population of Minneapolis in a financially sustainable way. It's about addressing our health crisis. It's about improving our quality of life.



Building world-class bike infrastructure is just as much about possibilites as it is about problems. Seattle Neighborhood Greenways won supporters in all the corners of the city by promoting improvements that make streets safer for all users. That's something Minneapolis can get excited about, too.



Creative Commons photos by Seattle Department of Transportation and carfreedays on flickr.


More details on our take on SWLRT and Kenilworth Trail


Photo Flickr/Mike Hicks


January 7 the Star Tribune ran a story about the proposed Southwest Light Rail line and potential impacts on the Kenilworth Trail. It includes quotes from Minneapolis Bicycle Advisory Committee Chair Nick Mason, Midtown Greenway Coalition ED Soren Jensen, and me. The frame is that bicyclists say that Southwest LRT "can work."



I want to add additional info on this very complex situation and clarify where the Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition is at on Southwest LRT.



The Coalition's position



The Minneapolis Bicycle Coalition supports building out the Twin Cities metro area transit network, including the Southwest LRT line. Good transit connections are important for bicyclists and for Minneapolis and the region.



The Coalition strongly supports the relocation of freight rail service from the Kenilworth Corridor. We strongly oppose any permanent elimination or rerouting of the Kenilworth Trail. Other potential options have a number of potential questions that are being studied; if studies show other options to be feasible, we will work with partners to evaluate details related to the trail.



The Kenilworth Trail is used by more than three thousand bicyclists per day, according to the most recent City of Minneapolis Bicycle Counts. The trail is an incredibly important corridor for commuters between southwest Minneapolis – and communities outside Minneapolis – and the major job centers downtown. It forms a critical connection between the Midtown Greenway, Cedar Lake Trail, and Cedar Lake Parkway.



Current possibilities and situation



There seem to be five options for Southwest LRT as it relates to the Kenilworth Corridor at this time. They all have supporters, opponents, and unanswered questions. The options with some info on where they stand:



1) Freight is rerouted from the Kenilworth Corridor and the light rail is built on the freight rail tracks.



This is certainly the best solution from our perspective and also is strongly supported by the City of Minneapolis. It would minimize impacts to the trail and greenspace and fulfills the original plan developed more than a decade ago.



The freight railroad company, Twin Cities & Western, has an enormous amount of power in this situation and, unfortunately, has placed unfeasible demands on a reroute in St. Louis Park. The current proposed freight reroute through St. Louis Park is bitterly opposed by many residents there. The Metropolitan Council is currently studying other potential freight reroute options and is continuing negotiations with the railroad, at Governor Dayton's request. We hope that study, due in late January, yields a strong potential solution. We will provide an update after the study is out.



2) A shallow tunnel is built to co-locate freight rail and LRT while keeping the Kenilworth trail.



The shallow tunnel is the presumed choice of the Metropolitan Council, which oversees the project. Current studies are evaluating whether the shallow tunnel might impact Cedar Lake or Lake of the Isles and also potential greenspace and landscaping plans with shallow tunnel option. Those are obviously very important considerations for the feasibility of a shallow tunnel option.



It is unclear exactly what the shallow tunnel would mean for the trail environment until these studies are finalized. As was stated in the Star Tribune article, we think a bicycle solution is possible, but there are other issues that need to get sorted first. The shallow tunnel would likely lead to a two- to three-year Kenilworth trail detour.



The shallow tunnel is currently estimated to cost an extra $160 million to the project. Some worry that a shallow tunnel could be accepted now and then eliminated in a later project stage to save money.



3) Build the freight rail, LRT, and bike trail all in the Kenilworth Corridor with no tunnel.



This option is not discussed a lot, so it isn't fully clear how feasible it is. It would certainly mean eliminating most of the greenspace and trees in the Kenilworth Corridor, which is rightly an unpopular thing to do. It would likely also require the demolition of a townhome complex and narrowing the Kenilworth trail. There would be lots of questions to answer and opposition to overcome for this to move forward.



4) Reroute the Kenilworth trail to locate freight rail and LRT together in the Kenilworth Corridor.



This option has garnered support from some at the Counties Transit Improvement Board, which will fund a significant portion of SWLRT. It would eliminate the Kenilworth Trail and reroute bicyclist and walkers on streets and trails around the west side of Cedar Lake. We strongly oppose this option because it would mean a 1-mile detour for many of the 3,000+ bicyclists who use the corridor on an average day. It would also mean eliminating significant greenspace.



5) Pause the project to find a different route in Minneapolis.



Some are saying that a Kenilworth alignment was the wrong choice for Minneapolis because it bypasses the dense corridors in Uptown and other neighborhoods. Some are arguing that the project should be delayed so that the route alignment can be changed.



The Metropolitan Council has said that changing the alignment would require a delay of several years. This would threaten the Southwest LRT project entirely because it would certainly fall out of the queue for federal funding. Others have questioned the need for a reroute delay to take several years, but there is clearly uncertainly about how long it would take or the impacts of such a delay.



It's unclear what alternative route would be feasible and work better. A Midtown Greenway-Nicollet Ave alignment was the only one to warrant significant study a few years ago and it was passed over for a number of reasons. There was concern on how that alignment would impact the Midtown Greenway and whether LRT was the appropriate scale for Nicollet where streetcar is currently being planned. An I-394 route and Hennepin Avenue route have been mentioned, but have challenges and questions as well.



Given the uncertainty of delay, the project history, and the amount of work that has gone into SW LRT with a current alignment, there will be a lot of resistance to a delay to realign. This resistance comes especially from key stakeholders at Hennepin County and other counties and the Metropolitan Council.



Next steps



You can find more information on the three pending Metropolitan Council studies here. We will provide another update when there is more information to report from the bicycling perspective.



 



What are your thoughts on the situation?



© Copyright 2026 Our Streets Minneapolis. All rights reserved.